Hail Caesar
Digby is offering Conquering the Drawbacks of Democracy By Philip Atkinson. Atkinson is, of course, a winger.
The wisest course would have been for President Bush to use his nuclear weapons to slaughter Iraqis until they complied with his demands, or until they were all dead. Then there would be little risk or expense and no American army would be left exposed. But if he did this, his cowardly electorate would have instantly ended his term of office, if not his freedom or his life.
The simple truth that modern weapons now mean a nation must practice genocide or commit suicide. Israel provides the perfect example. If the Israelis do not raze Iran, the Iranians will fulfill their boast and wipe Israel off the face of the earth. Yet Israel is not popular, and so is denied permission to defend itself. In the same vein, President Bush cannot do what is necessary for the survival of Americans. He cannot use the nation's powerful weapons. All he can do is try and discover a result that will be popular with Americans.
Now we lefties do tend to be abrasive, profane, cynical, but we rarely (never?) suggest genocide as a solution to any problem.
2 Comments:
Surely that article was just slightly tongue-in-cheek?
Although, who knows, I remember when the US Congress was debating when torture is acceptable, and I remember when Henry Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize.
'It's a strange, strange world we live in, Master Jack...'
I'm afraid it's probably nowhere near tongue-in-cheek. These aren't unusual suggestions at all among the neocons. They have no qualms about turning the whole Mid-East into glass.
Bush has mentioned using tactical nukes in the Mid-East and he's much more moderate than people like Philip Atkinson.
Human life (others') seems to matter little to them.
Post a Comment
<< Home