God Said Multiply, and Did She Ever

Yitta Schwartz, shown in the late 1980s

I wrote a post a long time ago where I stated merely replacing oneself my having one child each for a husband and wife didn't work because those children and perhaps their children would foster more progeny before the husband and wife had both died. A commenter said it did work for people to replace themselves and keep the population from growing.

Well, here's an example of the extreme. This woman had 18 children and lost 2 others by another account I read. So we'll do the math and divide 2000 by 18 to get 111 (actually 110 because her child is the 111th) descendants on average for each of her children. Not exactly a 1:1 ratio.

WHEN Yitta Schwartz died last month at 93, she left behind 15 children, more than 200 grandchildren and so many great- and great-great-grandchildren that, by her family’s count, she could claim perhaps 2,000 living descendants.

Mrs. Schwartz was a member of the Satmar Hasidic sect, whose couples have nine children on average and whose ranks of descendants can multiply exponentially. But even among Satmars, the size of Mrs. Schwartz’s family is astonishing. A round-faced woman with a high-voltage smile, she may have generated one of the largest clans of any survivor of the Holocaust — a thumb in the eye of the Nazis.

Her descendants range in age from a 75-year-old daughter named Shaindel to a great-great-granddaughter born Feb. 10 named Yitta in honor of Mrs. Schwartz and a great-great-grandson born Feb. 15 who was named Moshe at his circumcision on Monday. Their numbers include rabbis, teachers, merchants, plumbers and truck drivers. But these many apples have not fallen far from the tree: With a few exceptions, like one grandson who lives in England, they mostly live in local Satmar communities, like Williamsburg in Brooklyn and Kiryas Joel, near Monroe, N.Y., where Mrs. Schwartz lived for the last 30 years of her life.

Mrs. Schwartz had a zest for life and a devotion to Hasidic rituals, faithfully attending the circumcisions, first haircuts, bar mitzvahs, engagements and weddings of her descendants. With 2,000 people in the family, such events occupied much of the year.

...
Note: Headline links to source. Clicking on image will enlarge it (usually).

Just replace yourself, childwise

Been meaning to post about this for a while, but was too lazy.

In an effort to stem the tide of population growth its often suggested people only replace themselves.

Let's do the math.

This year there are two people in the world. A man and a woman.

They have two children or "replacements".

These children marry and have two "replacement" children for them and their spouse.

See the problem here? If the first two people are still alive, there are now 8 people in the population where there were initially only 2.

Barring accidents and other non-natural deaths, and considering multiple births, the population grows and it grows a lot.

The only way to keep the world's population under control is for a couple to have only 1 child.

Surprisingly, I had to quit looking for a "suitable" picture for this post. It had to be 3 generations which totaled 8 people and there were none I could find.

I did post a picture of a couple with only one child. That might already have changed or be in the process of changing, of course.